|
Truth needs no defence
Dear Feroz,
The
language you use is your worst enemy, not me.
Truth is no one's personal preserve or
exclusive property. It is quite capable of
standing on its own, without holier-than-thou
stalwarts like you to defend it.
Truth needs no defence; it is its own defence.
You
forget that everyone reserves the right to
laugh or to refuse to accept nonsense when it
is passed as the ultimate truth.
You
have to learn what truth really means, because
I don't think you can dish out secondhand
theories as the panacea for a perfect life on
this planet nor in the heareafter.
Nothing you've ever said here on this forum
has struck me as "original" -- it's all
borrowed from here and there and dished out to
us as if you've discovered the truth when most
of what you've said smacks of Khalifa Rashad's
mishmash theories about the Koran and the
Miracle of 19 which you've purveyed to us in
some of the longest submissions which were
quite boring to read.
You're terribly wrong in assuming that I am
ridiculing you in order to make myself feel
good. In fact I feel sorry for you. Seriously.
You
have the audacity to post something on a
public forum and then want to censor who can,
should, or should not read it. That exposes
your vanity.
There's nothing new under the sun my friend.
Consequently, there are no new ideas supported
by truths, as you are suggesting; only new
ways of looking at the same old same old same
old. Do you understand?
In
your second last paragraph you say: "Sometimes
the truth takes several generations to be
appreciated. But it's [sic] initial
purpose is to expose those who really are not
looking for the truth." Who told you that?
Why
don't you come out straight and say what you
have to say, like I do, rather
than obfuscate by trying to justify what you
wish to parrot, huh?
Regarding your anticipated response to your
much advertised revelation of truth in a
forthcoming post, it might surprise you that
words like mumbo-jumbo and pseudo-science
might be hurled at you by people other than
myself.
As
long as you keep coming from the field of
conditioning, you are never going to know the
truth that sets people like myself free from
all kinds of dogma. Or is it Godma?
Your last post is appended herebelow so
everyone can see how fairly and squarely I
have addressed your concerns.
Rashid Mughal
Dear Rashid
Why do you want to know when my 'revelation
of truth' is coming? You have ridiculed it,
and me, even before I posted it.
The post is not intended for close minded
people who attack only to tear down, provide
no solutions or answers of their
own, admit that they do not know religion or
science (i.e. have nothing to offer), and
ridicule others only for the sake of
making themselves feel good. I would
appreciate if you would not even read my
posts, let alone reply to them.
When new ideas supported by truths come, the
following always happens in this sequence,
1) The truth is first rejected and ridiculed
2) The truth is opposed, often violently
(physically or verbally)
3) The truth is finally accepted when it
becomes self evident.
Sometimes the truth takes several
generations to be appreciated. But it's
initial purpose is to expose those who
really are
not looking for the truth.
I already know what your response will be to
the forthcoming post: Is this it? Mumbo
jumbo. Pseudo science. Or you will
come up with some new words unrelated to a
serious and honest discussion of the
material in the post itself, new words
you are very good at, and serious and honest
discussion that you seem incapable of.
Feroz
|