> Actually he is a big improvement over Rashid Mughal, who called my intelligence assinine - without even reading my proposed post.

Perhaps, but your post #45 is rather silly. As I explained on the issue of gravity in my post #43, the universe is not that sensitive to
gravity. A large increase or decrease may have made the universe uninhabitable from the outset, and sudden large change would definitely shake things up, but you have grossly exaggerated the impact.

The recent discovery of dark energy, which has a strength similar to that of gravity, shows just how insensitive the universe actually is.
Dark energy has been working against gravity since the universe began yet it failed to cause the catastrophes you imagined. Adding dark energy into cosmological models resulted in no great overthrow of scientific theories any more than the introduction of dark matter. These discoveries help tune the theories, that's all.

It's beyond me why people feel the need to prove the existence of God. The prophet Jesus, in the Christian texts, praises those who believe without proof. A proof of God would destroy faith. Only acceptance would be possible. Yet if that was what God wanted, why wouldn't he just show himself? Logically, either God doesn't exist or he doesn't want his existence to be indisputable. If you believe God exists then you must also accept that his existence cannot be proved.