|
Mr. Zafar has simply maintained that the three
arguments of scholastic philosophy presented by
Dr. Iqbal are not acceptable. He says that most
scientists do not believe in God; hence, we
should also not believe in God.
Dr.Jaffary misunderstood the whole thing. It
was not me but Allama Sahib who rejected the
three arguments normally proposed for
the existence of God.
Scholastic philosophy has put forward
three arguments for the existence of God.
These arguments, known as the Cosmological,
the Teleological, and the Ontological,
embody a real movement of thought in its
quest after the Absolute. But regarded as
logical proofs, I am afraid, they are open
to serious criticism and further betray a
rather superficial interpretation of
experience.
Its
always advisable to read the subject more
than once to avoid making wrong assumptions.
Zafar
|