With all due respect I have noted your remark.
“Your
last letter leaves the impression that you have completely misunderstood me.”
I totally agree with you because I certainly do not
have enough intelligence to understand every thing that goes beyond my mental
limit. To my simple mind, in the present discussion both of you reach to the
same conclusion (Maintaining Musharraf as the Head of the State) with different
arguments. These different arguments may be very important to you two but to an
impartial observer it is not necessary to explain in his observation all the
tedious adventure to which you have gone through.
It is like going from a point A to a point B. Two
friends C and D may walk together, hand in hand, taking a straight line path and
reach B at the same time. It is also possible for the two to depart in opposite
directions on a circular path and reach to the destination B at the same time.
This circle should have the diameter AB and should pass through the points A and
B. There are many other possibilities as well. These different paths may be
important for C and D to continue their arguments, but an observer may find all
this childish and inutile.
In my humble opinion to blame a reader that he missed a
point is an excuse for the writer for not making his point clear.
“I
apologize to you for not elaborating my Farmers A, B and C model. As you
interpreted, I do not have farmer D in the model. Farm is
The above model is all yours. In a group of farmers all
farmers are equal. So you can say that A=B= (Any member of C). It is only true
if you consider them all doing the same work such as tilling the field and
sowing the plants. But on a big cooperative farm some members (farmers) are
doing something else than proper farming. There will
be a group of persons (farmers) who will be doing administrative jobs
such as the management of the farm. The politician B will fall in this subgroup.
So, B will be different than any other remaining member of C. This particular B
politician/s that you are talking, he/they robbed and was/were corrupt but
was/were constitutionally elected representative/s of the majority of the
farmers (people). Your “so called elected politicians” remark is
unjustified. Now, your favourite
farmer A is entirely different. He came to power (to take care of the farm)
through illegal means whichh in legal term is called a treason. In this group
presently, he is the only member. The past members are all dead. To say A=B is
wrong.
I will gladly accept your wish of “long live
Musharraf”, but please don not insist that I should also accept your
fallacious arguments.
“One
more thing Khan Sahib. I think discussions should be for mutual learning and
positive contributions. In civilized discussions when educated people come down
to insulting each other, then its time for me to respectfully exit. It
makes me very sad to be put in the same category as the Chaudhrys’ of Gujrat.”
The Chaudhrys of Gujrat, as far as, I know are
respectable and well know politicians in
Again, I
will beg your excuse and be sure that nothing was pre-planned or intentional.
With all
due respect.
Yours,
Ahsan
Dec. 12, 2007.