|
Javaid Virk is obviously
not pleased with the direction this discussion has taken. He asks why the
disputants in this debate have chosen to focus on the "physical"
and scientific rather than the "abstract". While, he is well within his rights to
suggest changing the course of the debate into discussions about something
less tangible, it is also important to state that the discussions thus far,
based on scientific evidence of the nature of the physical are entirely
apposite. Claims made about the physical world can only be verified through
a scientific approach. As for the abstract and conceptual, well, what can I
say? A belief for example, in a personal god is hardly rational and is
rarely governed by the strictures of logic and rationality for those who
advocate it.
Farzana Hassan
|