|
IMRAN KHAN AND THE MQM
By Mohammad Ali Khan
It would perhaps be fair to
say that most of the current supporters of MQM
would be members of Pakistan Tehrik e Insaf if
their party didn’t exist. It would perhaps also
be fair to say that MQMs public support has
remained static during the last two decades
whereas PTI is a party experiencing dynamic
growth during the last few years. The latest IRI
political survey of Pakistan gives both these
parties an equal level of public support. The
survey also gives Imran Khan a popularity of 38%
while Altaf Husain stands at 11%. This
particular statistic may be a reflection of
PTI’s stature as a national party and MQM as
primarily a provincial one.
Imran Khan has generally
admired the dedication, commitment,
organisational skills and discipline which has
catapulted MQM into the forefront of national
politics during the last two decades. But he is
also mystified by Altaf Husain’s decision to
stay away from millions of his suffering
supporters. Imran believes that his presence in
Pakistan would have been a boon to his
supporters, and fears for Altaf Husain’s life
are no different from the fears for any other
political leader’s life.
Imran believes that Altaf
Husain’s decision to swear allegiance to the
Queen by seeking, taking and celebrating British
nationality raises many questions about his
patriotism and commitment to Pakistan. He
believes that Altaf Husain and MQM could have
provided an ideal platform for the youth of the
entire country but their overwhelming initial
emphasis on ethnicity and digression into
militancy took away that opportunity from them .
As a result MQM’s public support has remained
virtually frozen for the last twenty years.
In their passionate pursuit
of seeking legitimate rights for the Mohajirs of
Sindh, Imran believes, MQM suffered and
sacrificed tremendously, but failed to develop a
national agenda and even the good points it had
began to be seen in a tainted light. This was
unfortunate as MQM was the first political force
in the country since independence which had
developed an enviable capacity to mobilise the
middle classes of the country. Imran thinks that
MQM’s appeal in urban Sindh remains strong but
is unfortunately reflective of its almost
permanent provincial status. This is a big
disadvantage as it prevents the many talented
individuals within MQM from rising on the
national scene as national leaders and restricts
MQM’s appeal as a National Party.
Imran strongly believes
that PTI offers a very strong alternative to the
traditional supporters of MQM with the
additional advantage of a truly national
platform which extends to all four provinces. On
the political front both MQM and PTI have stood
for a change in the status
quo and have widely attracted the educated
youth, but MQM’s politics during the last
decade has wavered on this front as it shifted
its support from government to government and
policy to policy weakening its moral stance. For
example MQM organised a massive rally not long
ago to protest the PMLN “insult” to the venue
where Benazir was assassinated but has failed to
organise similar protests over issues like
inflation, unemployment etc. afflicting the
poor.
Inspite of its
participation in the governments of the nineties
and then the first decade of the 21st
century, Imran believes, MQM failed to address
the real problems of its people. From an
opponent of the status quo, MQM became a
supporter and part of it. Lacking a clearly
defined development agenda, MQM built impressive
roads and flyovers in Karachi, but neglected to
build hospitals and schools. It did virtually
nothing to improve the urban transportation for
the poor masses of Karachi but managed to create
the first “planned” slum of Karachi---the
Mauripur Truck Stand. And hundreds of thousands
of MQM supporters have remained jobless,
struggling to survive.
Since all its decisions are
taken in London, Imran says, MQM failed to
capitalise on the tremendous intellectual input
which was available to it in Karachi , Hyderabad
and other urban centres of Sindh . MQM’s
decision making mainly relied on political
loyalists and routinely excluded highly
qualified experts from within their supporters.
Yet to their credit, MQM
has managed to retain the support of most,
though not all, educated Mohajirs. This may
also be due to the fact that for more than a
decade, MQM’s supporters were virtually denied
exposure to alternate political platforms
through various means including intimidation.
The MQM Haqiqi leadership
has been kept in prison for more than a decade
thanks first to MQM’s association with Musharraf
and now to PPP. With Nawaz Sharif and Benazir in
forced exile during the last decade courtesy
their patron Musharraf, the MQM had a lot of
space to maneuver. Imran himself was also not
allowed to enter Sindh for the last two years
under pressure from MQM leadership who felt
angered by his decision to take legal action
against Altaf Husain in London.
Imran believes that the
events of 12th May 2007 were a
watershed in MQM’s history. MQM’s decision to
oppose the immensely popular Chief Justice and
support an extremely unpopular dictator and then
its questionable role in the mayhem that took
place in Karachi forced Imran to re- evaluate
his view of MQM. He reluctantly concluded that
MQM’s preference for expediency and the absence
of its leadership from Pakistan will never let
it play the national role it was capable of.
Imran feels that there are
certain unidentified and dangerous elements
within the MQM who have unwittingly managed to
drag the party into a lot of trouble by
focussing on violence, once leading even Altaf
Husain to offer his resignation. He believes
that his legal pursuit in UK would help identify
these elements. If MQM leadership was to purge
such elements from the party, Imran feels, and
its leadership returned to Pakistan, it can
carve for itself a broader political future and
prevent itself from fading out at some time in
future.
Imran is impressed by the
hard work of MQM functionaries in different city
governments of Sindh but feels that their
development work has lacked transparency leading
many to question the way money has been spent on
different programs.
Imran believes that MQM ‘s
leadership still suffers from a persecution
complex and has sought to hedge this fear by
seeking support from USA and UK. As a result
the MQM leaders are not allowed to criticise
America or its policies .
As Imran returned to Sindh
for a day after an absence of two years he was
encouraged by the tremendous amount of support
he received from the Mohajirs, Pathans, Punjabis
and Sindhis who were mainly responding to the
stand he had taken on important national issues
during this period. Imran and PTI seek to
capitalise on this support and pursue issue
based politics in Sindh. They believe they can
find common ground with MQM on many of these
issues .
|