|
Dear Pervaiz
Sahib,
The violence,
no matter what the driving factors or
motives, is a human trait that exists in all
of us irrespective of what religion we
follow or do not follow any at all.
Terrorism is simply another face of the
violent human character. Many may not have
noticed or may have ignored the fact that no
universally acceptable definition of
‘terrorism’ exists. The reason for this
difficulty is simple; the term is used by
every one to advance their own point of view
highlighting their own values to define
right or wrong, which may or may not be
supported by others.
In the post
9/11 political arena, CIA and Zionist funded
writers have had an open season on Muslims
to a point that the term terrorism has
become synonymous with Muslims. It was a
conscious and a deliberate exercise to
achieve certain political gains. Such
campaigns come and go depending upon the
changing political circumstances of a
country or a region.
The violent
human nature has been noted at work against
each other on the basis of religion, sects,
language, nationality, color of skin and
countless other excuses. The main driving
factor is always a personal prejudice
against others for whatever reason. When
many individuals join together on the basis
of some common denominator (religion,
language, color etc), a synergetic
phenomenon gets created. The individual’s
personal prejudices assume a subconscious
state but its very presence gives rise to a
new collectively accepted motive that
creates a mob like behavior, to act against
others. The collective behavior is often
referred to the group ideology keeping the
group members under the same banner. They
soon forget that fundamentally all the
individuals are satisfying their
subconscious prejudices, safely masked under
the group behavior often referred to as the
party ideology.
It is
certainly worth repeating that violence or
terrorism is neither the monopoly of any
religion, nor any particular nation of
country. The socio-economic, cultural and
political environment creates and modifies
such behavior.
Javed I.
|