Mr. Hussain,

With due respect, I must say that I cannot make any head or tail out of your post #50. It is a page full of disjointed commentary on several unrelated subjects that lacks in cohesion and an overall structure to follow the narrative presented. To start with, I find the statement made by the opening sentence not only wrong but also a bit offensive too. You wrote:

 “Intolerance in the name of divinity is a common trait in Islam”.

It is not Islam that is intolerant, but I am sure there are many of its followers who are, just as there are so many intolerant people following other religions or no religion at all. You should study the Quran to find out how tolerant Islam is supposed to be. Following this statement, your next sentence is totally ambiguous. You have referred to (un-named) scholars who are quick to deny …….  The question is which scholars are you referring to and what exactly are they denying?

By the time you get to your third sentence in the same paragraph, you have totally changed the direction of your narrative, you wrote:

“Many people think that the tragic events of 1947 are a matter of the past and therefore do not qualify for any further verification”.  

As an academic study, people have been discussing the subject of partition for over 60 years. But I fail see what verification are you looking for? You did not specify.

There have been undesirable consequences of the partition, but I fail to see why is it shaking the foundation of Pakistan? There are pros and cons of the partition, but the real blunder that I see was that they created two wings of Pakistan, 1100 miles, divided by a hostile country. It would have been better if the had created Bangladesh from the beginning. That is three countries in stead of two. The people of the two wings had nothing in common with each other except religion.

From the partition problem, you then decided to jump back to religion. You wrote:

“Its not the fault of Islam that democracy could not flourish in Pakistan, it’s the fault of those who thought that Islam can replace democracy. Islam is a medieval thought process totally unaware of what democracy is”. 

Your above statement makes it obvious that you have no concept of Islam.The Quran, does not talk about any specific methods of governments, it does not have to. It has requirements of equality, freedom and security for all. It does not say how you run your government. It does not have to know any thing about democracy or any other government system.  Islam’s emphasis is on what is delivered to the people, rather what system is adapted.  Just as, it does not tell you how you should travel; you may travel by camel or by air.  

I totally disagree with you, Islam is not a medieval thought process, it was however, sent down during medieval time. It applies today, the way it did centuries ago.  

After having attacked Islam, you have quickly changed the direction one more time and decided to explore Indo-Pakistani nuclear weapons. All of a sudden you are now concerned about the nuclear safety strategy and logistics. You wrote: 

“But for Pakistan her nuclear arsenal has become a curse because of the unending cycle of Islamic extremism which is threatening the very existence of the country”. 

“Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is definitely her own but its storage and safety has become an issue for many others”. 

The above mentioned  statements indicate that you are spending too much time watching CNN. The Zionist-Neocons, of course, will have you believe exactly what you have stated.  

I fail to see the connection between, what you call, “the Islamic extremism” and the fact that Pakistan has nuclear weapons.  

Those whom you have decided to refer to as Islamic extrimists, were called freedom fighters during 1980s, when the invader was USSR. The same very people are now called the Islamic extremists because there are so many of those in North America who do not think for themselves and parrot what is repeated too many time into their ears. During the WWII, when the Europeans were fighting against the Germans, I suppose they were called the Christian extremists? Right?  

Islamic terrorism and conspiracy theory are two terms which are being tossed around like no tomorrow to mask the treachery that the Zionist-Neocon groups have been doing since 9/11. In a nutshell, the sinister geo-political plans revolve around the sources of the most important raw materials, the energy – oil and gas and the trade routes for transportation.  

Mr. Hussain: my response to the second half of your post #50 is as follows:  

The Islamic terrorism that you talk about with so much poise did not exist in Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan until the Americans moved into those regions. The bombing of the FATA region is not about killing any Al-Qaeda members; no one knows if there is one around. Most likely, Al-Qaeda does not even exist, perhaps never did. In Iraq, all those resistors who fought against the Americans were conveniently called Al-Qaeda and that is what you have picked up from CNN and Fox News Network. There was no so called Islamic terrorism in FATA or Pakistan, until the Americans moved in and started their mischief. The drone attacks in FATA was expected to create a reaction against America and its allies and since Pakistan is one of the reluctant ally, it has to bear the brunt. This alliance is forced through coercion and large bribes to the people at the top. CIA and RAW have created TTP to make it look like a religious intolerance exploding in Swat and other NW regions. The combination of poverty, illiteracy and poor governance provides fertile grounds to bring vulnerable people out of the woodwork to start any act that money wants them to perform.   

NRO was introduced by Musharraf in accordance with Anglo-American instructions the moment they had discovered B.B ready to dance to their tune. All this is being done to Balkanize Pakistan to find easily manageable routs from the Arabian sea to the Central Asia. If Balochistan can be separated, that will be wonderful for the Anglo-American imperial designs.  

Now that NRO has backfired, it remains to be seen what will be the real impact on certain beneficiaries of the ordinance. At a minimum a few will get their feathers snipped. That will be a good start any way.   

But I am happy to say that in Pakistan, there are many excellent media outlets to keep the public informed about the misdeeds of many in power. During the last couple of years, the enemies of Pakistan have done plenty to make ISI fade away and weaken the army. But they have not been successful and they never will be. Further good news is that the country has its independent judiciary evolved and is in place, which is one highly desirable piece to support democracy. At present, Pakistan is stuck with the Anglo-American installed government, I am sure things are being done to keep them under control.  

All this may be wasted on you if you are selectively tuned to a group in Toronto, that works for Zionist-Neocon supporters to spread disinformation in connection with making Pakistani Balkanization a reality.   

Javed I. Chaudry,

Dec 23, 09