Christian Fundamentalism
Mark Robinson
|
 |
|
Mark Robinson |
Preface
Good afternoon, First of all I’d like
to thank those of you for joining us today, to all the speakers and
our Moderator Dr. Sohail. I was honored to accept this opportunity
today to talk about a topic that many of us read about but are not
familiar with its origin. We are more often than not shaped by media
and selected opinions about such topics within society and it is
somewhat hard to get a clear understanding of a certain belief. When
I began to write I was faced with the dilemma of how to approach
this topic. After reading many different articles and chapters I
chose to focus on the history of what could be called the dark side
of belief.
Christian Fundamentalism
The dark illusion of
fundamentalism hangs over America like dark clouds hanging over the
after math of 911. The United States of America continues to look
towards the Middle East to define fundamentalism, but to their ignorance all they really need
to do is look no further than their own backyard.
When you compare the birth of
Christianity to the introduction of the term fundamentalism you
discover that the literal relationship is about 100 years old.
The term fundamentalism was
introduced back in the late 1900’s and soon became widely accepted
as an identity for those how actively defended the traditions of
Christianity. Christianity introduced Fundamentalism to protect its
faith and doctrines from those who opposed the views and words of
the bible. Science and the growth of
rational thinking, along with other contradicting religions applied
the pressure on Christianity to stand firm to protect its
traditional beliefs. The threat on Christianity at this time was
mainly from within its own borders and not until the last 30 years
that pressure came from Middle Eastern religions.
The Beginning of the Christian
fundamentalism movement as we know it today came about in the late
1900’s which at the time people like
Dwight Moody,
Arthur
Pierson
and John
Darby were leading the way. As the turn of the 20th
century approached,
the American
fundamentalist beliefs were defined as the Five Fundamentals by the
General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church.
The 5 Fundamentals are:
1) Inerrancy of the
Scriptures –
This defined that the word of the bible was the true word.
2) The virgin birth and
the deity of Jesus
– This refers to Mary giving birth through Immaculate Conception to
the birth of god’s son.
3) The Doctrine of
substitutionary atonement through god’s Grace and Human Faith
– the understanding
that Jesus died on the cross for their sins. 4) The bodily
resurrection of Jesus – The belief that the dead body of Jesus
rases 3 days after his death to the heavens.
5) The authenticity of
Christ's miracles (or, alternatively, his pre-millennial second
coming –
Judgment day or Armageddon, the return to earth by Jesus Christ.
So with the five
fundamental principles instated by the start of the 20th
century Christian fundamentalism was defined. Before progressing to
the present time I would like to take a step backwards to emphasize
the seed responsible for the growth of the Christian fundamentalist
movement.
When the Americans
celebrate thanksgiving, they acknowledge the Pilgrims landing on the
east shores of their country. In 1620 Puritans traveled the seas
west to take up home in the new land bringing strong Christian
beliefs with hopes to define a land based on these principals. It
has been wittily observed that, Australia got the convicts, and
America got the Puritans. It was more darkly mused Australia must
have gotten first choice. Many of their virtues have helped carve a
nation with honesty and integrity, though it must also be clearly
stated that they are also responsible for laying a foundation on
fundamentalist principals by claiming that the true law is gods’
word found within the bible.
From the Entry of the
Puritans to America, religious piety began to decline within the
next 100 years. The decline brought about Great Awakening; this was
a movement that was established in New Jersey to rekindle the
following of god’s true law amongst the Colonists. Preachers like
Jonathon Edwards worked hard to spread the message that the devil
was ready to snatch their souls if they weakened their commitment to
God, so with this hellfire approach the support strengthened once
again. However as decades pasted, rationalistic views weakened the
religious movement and around the 1740’s came the age of
Enlightenment, as Philosopher Immanuel Kant among others brought
forward the need for people to have courage to speak their minds and
think for themselves. Enlightenment became the seed for a movement
challenging the ideals of Christian fundamentalism. This movement
has survived history and continues to grow stronger with each day.
After the American Revolution towards the end of the 18th
century, the second Awakening was on its way. The approach this time
was creating social stability and community identity. Through a
theological emphasis on living a life without sin, the concerns of
fortification, profanity, alcohol, Gambling and dishonesty were
challenged to regain personal piety. The new awakening once again
proved successful in the beginning until 1859 when Britain’s Charles
Darwin released the ‘Origin of the Species’, a book which would
change history and once again bring more concern as it challenged
religious literalism. The idea Darwin presented that life had
evolved and had not been created by a god, became a new threat and
by the time the twentieth century came the American movement that
the puritans once formed had now become Fundamentalism. This is
where the introduction of five fundamentals enters the history
books. Since this beginning Christian Fundamentalism has grown and
adjusted to its new environment in the twentieth century. As
Darwin’s theory evolved and science started to progress at a more
rapid rate, pressures for fundamentalism to keep defending its
position, grew.
Between 1920 and 1940
the Fundamentalists were concentrating on widen the grip on
Christian belief with a fundamentalist view; many Christians were
becoming mainstream modernists. The fundamentalists in turn decided
to remove the mainstream believers from the church. This was not an
easy task to do, so in turn the fundamentalists separated themselves
from the church and formed their own orthodox denominations. As the
new fundamentalist movement attempted to settle, it was not long
before another split would come along. This time a division within
the fundamentalist movement was about to unfold. Leaders such as
Carl Henry, Kenneth Kantzer and later on the more popular Billy
Graham would form what we know today as Evangelicals. The new group
wanted to bring back many of the clergy and supporters who were
among the mainstream modernists. Separating themselves from the
Fundamentalists was due to a number of concerns that they had with
the movement. Evangelicals felt that Fundamentalism was
anti-intelligent, intolerant and lacked concern for social issues.
After this split within Fundamentalism many of the Fundamentalists
withdrew from society and became politically active. Leaders of
Christian conservatives such as Jerry Farwell and Pat Robertson
joined with the movement in the 1970’s and went on the offensive to
bring other Christian groups onto their side. Today we see the
effects of their efforts by the confusion many make between
fundamentalists, Evangelicals and all other Christian denominations.
To this point
Fundamentalism was an American past time and was only referred to as
a Christian term. This all changed with a high media profile of the
Iran hostage crisis in 1979. To explain and familiarize the American
public to Islamic faith a comparison was made to Christian
Fundamentalism by journalists which led to the coining of the phase
Islamic Fundamentalism. As we worked our way into the 1990’s
terrorism started to show its ugly face as Christian Fundamentalist
groups took more violent approaches to getting their point across.
To give an example of the
distance fundamentalist Christianity has gone to, you just have to
look at the fundamentalist driven group ‘Army of God’. Believing
that their activity is lawful and theologically justified, they are
a pro life terrorist organization which resolves to use deadly
forced in its attempt to end abortion within the United States.
Their acts of terrorism included bombings and kidnappings as well
being linked to as many as 280 anthrax threats towards abortion
clinics since Sept 11 2001. But even before the turn of the century
we had experienced the serious crimes of fundamentalism with
America, in the summer of 1994 Reverend David C. Trosch wrote to
congress warning those politicians who do not strongly oppose
abortion, along with those who speak in favor of abortion would be
at grave risk. Two weeks later, former minister Paul Hill drove to
the ladies centre, an abortion clinic in Pensacola, Florida and shot
and killed Dr. John Bayard Britton and James Barrett the doctors
Escort. Later that year bullets were mailed along with death threats
to other doctors. These events show how acts of terrorism are a part
of Christian fundamentalism. Many may argue that not all
fundamentalists are terrorists and will not go as far as to commit
these sorts of crimes and I agree, but these organizations are built
by a larger body of moderates that fuel the front line.
Fundamentalists also condone the use of contraceptives which leads
the way for a higher pregnancy rate with young Christian teenage
girls. Teenage pregnancy is then accompanied in most cases with
poverty and lack of education which then shapes our society, all
because ones faith is so strongly against the practical use of birth
control.
In the last few years more
controversy regarding fundamentalists has surfaced with the attempt
to bring Creationism back disguised as what they call Intelligent
Design. Efforts were made by members of the Dover, Pennsylvania
community to bring the teaching of Intelligent Design to the
education system. This split the community in half and fortunately
for those who supported the teaching of evolution Judge Jones
decided the outcome of the case in their favor in a federal court.
Today’s world and tomorrows will
be faced with many attempts by fundamentalists trying to hold on to
the teaching of what they call the true word of God. They are now up
against their strongest challenge yet as a free thinking movement is
circling the globe. As people still continue to struggle for
political freedom in many countries a new type of freedom is also on
the rise. More and more people are acquiring the materials and
modern day ways of communicating. The communities of fundamentalism
are finding it harder to hide away their loyal followers from
scientific facts and logical thought. The true test for
fundamentalism as it approaches the next decade will be protecting
its followers from discovering science and reason. How the core
groups react, time will only tell. Let’s hope people will be free to
think for themselves and people that do stand up for what they
believe in will not be subject to threats and attacks for doing so.
I am not sure we are close to seeing the end of Christian
fundamentalism but I would like to see an end to the hate and
suffering it causes when the so called true word of god is looked
upon as above the law. We the people have voted a government to
apply a law to everyone with in the nation and it is important that
everyone understands their role in society. We must concern
ourselves to what is best for humanity and in order to have peace
and harmony logic must prevail.
Thank you.
Mark Robinson
www.cdrh.humanists.ca
cdrh@humanists.ca