Dear
Friends: (Regarding post # 96 & 98)
Mr.
Mustayeen Khan Sahib has taken us thru the annals of history
to list names of eminent Muslim scholars. I have not gone to
the pages of encyclopedia to check validity of reference but I
trust his list is accurate albeit incomplete for all
achievements of Muslim scholars of a civilization bygone.
Nonetheless, I agree with his list.
However,
I am at a loss how to tell him that he has missed the point
completely. His argument in para #4 is like referring to name
of Dr. Abdul Salam (Nobel Laureate) to prove that Muslims have
been vigorously participating in 20th century
intellectual discourse.
I
think member of Family of Heart would benefit the most if he
theorized reasons that led to intellectual suppression in
Muslim countries other than colonialism, which we all agree
had negative effect.
Now
we have a new theory that I was not aware of. Lack of
democracy in Muslim countries is being theorized as
Intellectual stagnation because libraries were burnt in Muslim
countries in 12th & 13th century.
Good Lord!
Lets
go beyond rhetoric and look at factual data. The era of
original works and the idea of learning from translated books
from various languages that filled the libraries due to be
burnt (as above) had long gone. By end of eighteenth century
only one medical book was translated, which was already about
one hundred years old. Upon completion of the translation it
was proudly presented to King Sultan Mehmed (Of course, it was
an achievement in times of decay).
Mundane
factors of movement of history have been present in all parts
of the word. I think most appropriate question is whether
there is anything in Islamic doctrine that was and is an
impediment to logical thinking?
I
think yes, very much so. There is something in Islam. Read the
prescription for goodness of society in paragraph #8, “…
be it Islamic or democratic, or even, dare I say,
authoritarian”. I wonder as if there is a difference in
Islamism and authoritarianism? And by the way, that is what
Islamism is when this ideology spouts out of the hearts of
faithful to be a noose of authority that seals the destiny of
individuals and society. Shall we say Islamist also, if our
good friend Subuhi allows it?
Regards
Tahir