Dear
Mr. Mustayeen Khan (Reference to your Post #92):
Kindly
allow me to be part of your dialogue with Mr. Ahsan Khan.
The
discussion “Why has democracy not taken root in most
Muslim countries” seemed to have faded away. Thank you for
your input to rekindle it with some ideas; not necessarily all
of them are new but still deserve attention and analysis as we
come across them repeatedly.
The history of
democracy, which you have dug out of civilizational antiquity,
is hard to meaningfully connect with the topic under
discussion because humans can no longer benefit from a debate,
who invented the wheel? The same is true of democracy also.
The social experiments and experience has brought humans to
the point where the right of ruling on hereditary basis has
unanimously been knocked down.
I
think you understood democracy utterly differently when you
called it ‘Institutionalized Opposition’. Democracy is
institutionalization of human ideas of collective living and
making laws as opposed to divinely ordained laws for humans.
And sure, democracy does not always get it right. It may also
mean failure like other humans endeavours. But this is a point
of celebrating human failures because seeds of human future
lie in the flexibility of human ideas and not in the rigidity
of so called “Divine Laws”. The divine law has been
failing humans for no less than past 10,000 years that history
has recorded so candidly.
Let
me try to root out one misconception that all Islamist
including yourself, knowingly or unknowingly, put forward as
an argument to rationalize “Why has democracy not taken root
in most Muslim countries”. You proposed, “Islam
has nothing to do with it”. It appears quite a few times
in your post in bold letters.
Islam
has nothing to do with it. Well, it is not the whole truth.
Islam has a lot to do with it if not all. First, please
consider that Islam does not and cannot exist in a vaccuum.
Any attempt to distance Islam from Muslims is not going to fly
well. Muslims are the face of Islam and nothing else; period!
If Islam was carved out by a divine hand and not meant to be
subservient to Muslims’ ill-will, where is the power of
moving finger of God to get the Islam the way it was intended
to be? I think you need to reconsider the very fundamentals of
your ideas because Islam (or any other religion for that
matter) was not as divine as you conceive it to be.
I
think you make your best point in Para #14. You wrote:
“I firmly believe that the
primordial reason that there is no democracy in the Third
World Countries, be they Muslim or non-Muslim states, is the
suppression of the intellectual development of the masses”. How true! Have you ever
thought though, what are reasons for suppression of intellect
other than theory of colonialism, which has definite merits?
You are also right about some other parts of the world also
where there is no stable democracy yet. But lets keep our
focus on Muslim countries for now to stay close to the topic.
You
know that Muslims have been the rulers in large part of the
world for almost one thousand years prior to buckling to
colonialism. The real question is what was the reason for
suppression of intellectual development during pre-colonial
period in the Muslim world? Please let me know if you think
that divine-Islam (or any other religion) has seeds of
rationalism and enlightenment in it for intellectual
development.
With
kind regards.
Tahir