|
Dear Javed Chaudry:
“There are dozens of factors,” you say, “which contribute to the
political culture of a society [and]
religion is simply one of them.” In the same breath you rush to add:
“Religion is being discussed (and attacked) [on
this forum] as if [it]
is the predominant factor.”
Perhaps I should point out that “the political culture of a society”
that you mentioned is composed of history and tradition, both of which
are the main ingredients of human conditioning, and religion is the
spice that adds pungency to the whole concoction of human relations and
the murderously patriotic values of its followers, causing nation to
rise against nation. So religion cannot be let off the hook mildly; it
is the main culprit in human affairs, whether you like it or not, and
whether you agree with me or not.
You’re right, of course, that many a time I have slammed Islam
mercilessly, but I should perhaps explain that my beef is with
“political” Islam, what has come to be known as Islamism, the Islam of
prophets of doom like Osama Bin Laden; and we should have a bigger beef
with the Christianity of the Born-Again idiot called George W. Bush and
his cohort Tony Blair, but that is not our concern here, except that
they head the most destructive democratic superpowers on the face of the
earth today.
I don’t think I have ever quibbled about the Islam of the Sufis, for
example, but there are Muslims, and I am sure you know them too, who
decry Sufiana practices as un-Islamic. Again, that is an issue for
another day. For now, please rest assured that I know full well the
various Islams that are out there, and what their basic tenets and
coercive principles are, but they are not relevant to our present
discussion.
Basically, I slam those Muslim parrots who tout Islam without knowing
the place of religion in our lives. They are the robots drunk on the
opiate of the masses. More important, I am slamming our own collective
and individual ignorance about how to connect with the unseen power we
call God, and so I have never said spirituality has no place in our
lives.
In pointing out what you call my “miss [sic]
concepts about a religion (any religion)” you suggest that I’ve “cited
examples of persecution on the basis of religion,” and “Mr Mughal’s
citations are correct, but I strongly disagree with the conclusions that
he has drawn from them.”
Without going into details about the Ahmadi problem in Pakistan or the
case of intolerant and racist Saudi Arabia, let me say this: a religion
is as good (and no better) than the people who profess it. Just as the
Good Book tells us that the tree shall be known by the fruit it bears,
so also judge I the people who profess Islam by the deeds they perform,
and I don’t think anyone can take away one’s sacred right to face up to
the mirror and say that something is truly rotten in the state of
Denmark.
Rashid Mughal
__________________________________________________________
|