"Family of
Searchers/students/heart"
First of all my thinking are that we are getting away from topic
(especially from its internal situation) and we are getting into the
topic whether God is present or not and are trying to understand it
through references. Especially Mahatma Budd is referenced a lot and
obviously our HOLY QURAN. Believers are taking shelter of QURAN and
non-believers or semi believers are quoting 'Mahatma Budd' I agree with
believers in GOD that they have valid example of 'Wahdaniat and
existence of KHUDA' by giving example of Quraan. But I want to ask that
When Mahatma Budd even denied God. Again the topic was very straight
forward, "Should we say good bye to God".
This question is valid logically when you believe
in the presence of GOD. Otherwise you can not or should not touch the
topic to explain the out of topic area that whether God is there or not
in this boundary. But even if we are slipping through the topic, out of
its heat or out of our heat we must try to understand and read the
searchers of past. Especially Mahatma Budd is victim of all of you guys
in many ways (especially when you want to be 'danishwar') I want to say
that this is not right path to prove your point of view, because the
message of Budda is not (totally/basically) understood.
Here is the key to his philosophy and please try to
understand and do not say he denied God. His student (like always) asked
him, If there is God? He said I do not know. His student asked 'That
means He is not there? Mahatma said "I do not know if He is not there.
I strongly believe in 'Talash' and only someone can find truth if
balance can be acquired in Talash. Balance is my outcome of whole lot 'Tapassiya"
and life and it attracts me, calls me.
I think what ever exists is exists because of balance tolerance and
non-violence. And we can not even walk because when we walk our second
foot is always in air and if we do not know how to balance with force of
gravity we can not step up for next move.
I will try to define and then elaborate my 'Theory of balance and
tolerance' at other time.
Right now I want to give one example to advocate my theory of BALANCE
out of Mahatma Budd's search for truth. Here it is When Mahatma Budd
stopped eating and started losing hid body and obviously an existence,
a limit reached where forces of balance came into action(existence)and
he figured out that if he denied life he will deny all aspects of life
so he was told or he himself told to him or something happened or even
death talked to him and he woke up and got Nirvana (as is said) and he
said 'yes' to presence of life and developed a new dimension of
impartial insight to everything and built his philosophy.
But no one should say he denied God or he says God
is not person but a presence (Because if you believe in a presence then
you have to believe in source just like Sunlight which is coming from
SUN because light has
always a source so a presence does a presenter).
Mahatma Budh's message is same as Bulleh Shah who says
Bulea ki janan men kon
when some one does not know who he himself is how can he says about
presence/existence of other forces. Our goal is first to find out who we
are and try to know brain totally/our nature/reactions and try to be an
active participant to even in elimination of in-justice Please try to
achieve/ establish a state of balance in this search to communicate with
others and yourselves,
do not get please angry as balance will lose its identity.
Existentialism is a very important philosophy after Buddhism which is
dependent on questions like being and nothingness especially when it is
explained by 'Jean Paul Sartre'.
But without establishing state of balance between being and nothing and
between being and super-being we can not adjust our thinking to even
appear.
Please wait for my so-called 'Theory of balance' as it needs a lot to
even define it. But that needs another century
bulea ki jana men kon
Regards
Yours
Afzaal Naveed
http://www.afzaalnaveed.com/
