Dear
Rafi,
I was not aware
of the new book that Scott Peck has written.
I just looking
it up at Amazon, and found it interesting, but it is not a book that
I have an interest in reading.
Perhaps this is
part of my current psycho-spiritual profile, but I tend to think of
good and evil as acts – rather than personifications of people. Over
time, of course, the actions shape the personality. I understand
that Mother Theresa once said that she could have ended up being a
Hitler.
I believe that
how environment affects humans is not adequately understood. I
discussed that in another paper presented at a seminar of “Our
Family” (of the Heart). A link to that is given below.
http://www.drsohail.com/FOTH/November28/Masud_Sheikh.htm
I am inclined to
say that Scotty’s (I have never met him, but have read most of his
books, so feel like calling him by the name used by his friends)
decision to “become a Christian” has also affected the way he looks
at things, and the words he chooses. In one of his books, he says
that his choice to embrace Christianity made him a little sad as
well, since it meant that he no longer could be so many other things
(e.g. a Buddhist, or Sufi etc.) as well.
Dr. Sohail
(or another psychologist/psychiatrist in our Family) may
also wish to comment. To Dr. Sohail and others: The book “Glimpses
of the Devil” has the following self-explanatory sub-title “A
Psychiatrist's Personal Accounts of Possession, Exorcism, and
Redemption”.
Instead of taking about “exorcism” in the context of the “Devil”, I
expect there could be explanations where “exorcism” is from
“personality characteristics” that have become part of the human.
Hitler could perhaps have been, with a great degree of pain, been
exorcised of the “Devil” that possessed him.
Thank you for
your comments – let us hope that the conversation now opens up
Masud
Those who elect to be free in thought and deed must not hanker
after the rewards, which the world offers those who put up with
its fetters – T.H. Huxley