Family of the Heart Seminar - September 10, 2004

PROF. ABDUS SALAM'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE WORLD OF SCIENCE

 By Darakhshanda S., Toronto ON.

 “Neutral current bring rewards” was the head line that appeared in the Nature magazine of 18thOctober,

DARAKSHANDA S.

 1979. The Press release from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences on October15, 1979 read Nobel Prize in Physics to be shared equally between Professor Sheldon L Glashow, Harvard University USA, Professor Abdus Salam ICTP, Italy and Imperial College Great Britain, and Professor Steven Weinberg, Harvard University, USA.

Today exactly after 25 years I take the pleasure to talk about what was the Contribution of Abdus Salam to the World of Science and what is it all about that brought honour to our country.

The focus of Abdus Salam’s research had been the micro world of atom. The study of the subject dates back to centuries but the mystery is yet not solved completely. Atom can be defined as the smallest representative of an element that consists of the negatively charged electrons revolving around a very dense nucleus composed of positively charged protons and neutrons. Certain types of forces hold these building blocks of an atom together. For example, the electromagnetic force carried by photons holds the electrons and the nucleons together to form a neutral atom. This force represents the interaction between charges. The electromagnetic force also holds the atoms together to form the molecules and the aggregates of molecules. The aggregates could be small or large even as large as you and I. The chemical and biological molecules interact with each other due to the electromagnetic forces. Essentially, we are electromagnetic creatures inhabiting an electromagnetic planet.

Towards the end of the last century, certain heavy elements were found to exhibit radioactivity. This discovery disclosed the existence of strong and weak nuclear forces. As a consequence, Physics of atomic nucleus was developed extensively. The strong nuclear force carried by gluons holds the protons and neutrons of the nucleus together despite a similar charge on them. The weak nuclear force is responsible for beta decay of the atomic nuclei. The process involves decay of the neutron, with charge zero into a positively charged proton, emission of negatively charged electron and a neutral and massless neutrino. It is the weak force that mediates production of the solar energy by converting hydrogen into deuterium. The micro world of atom is thought to be governed by the weak, strong and electromagnetic forces, gravity is a holdout. Indeed it is the interplay of the forces and the building blocks that gives rise to enormous beauty and complexity of our universe. The Physicists categorize the fundamental building blocks as matter particles or fermions and the force particles or the bosons.

Salam’s hypothetical equation postulated a relationship between the electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces. More elaborately, the theory proposed that the two forces are the manifestation of the same underlying force, and he named it the electroweak force. In the process of proving this unification, it turned out that the phenomenon was not only factual but it also indicated the existence of certain particles that were not known before. Hence the theory unraveled the then undiscovered particles, the weak vector bosons, known as W and Z bosons. W-bosons mediate charge current while Z-bosons mediate neutral current of the weak force.

The theme Salam worked on goes fairly back in the past. From the earliest times in the history, man desired to understand the complexities of nature in the fewest elementary concepts. The first pursuit has been to discover wheels within wheels, to discover the innermost wheel if any such existed. A second pursuit has been that for the fundamental forces, which make the wheels, go round and enmesh with one another. The third pursuit is for the unification of the forces into a single entity.

Newton in the seventeenth century, explained the two disparate phenomena of falling an apple on the ground and moon revolving around the earth by a common force, the gravity. In the nineteenth century, Oersted and Faraday showed that electricity and magnetism represented different aspects of the same force, electromagnetism. Then in 1865, Maxwell predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves and interpreted light as electromagnetic wave event. In fact, this discovery set a path for the entire electronic revolution of today leading to the invention of radio, television and radar etc. X-rays discovered as radiations of wavelength shorter than ultraviolet rays, were discovered by the end of the nineteenth century and were immediately exploited in the medical diagnostics.

Einstein who was born more than hundred years ago, was the first to dream of the ultimate unification of all forces (Electromagnetic force, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force and gravity). In 1905, Einstein showed the relationship between mass and energy through the velocity of light thereby predicted that enormous amount of energy is bundled in a few pounds of atoms. The world saw the evidence in 1945 in the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

While looking at a Scientist’s contributions, it is very important to understand that no idea or discovery in Science can be completely attributed to one person alone. Salam beautifully described this fact in his Nobel lecture by quoting what G.P Thomson had said in his Nobel lecture in 1937; “…The goddess of learning is fabled to have sprung full grown from the brain of Zeus, but it is seldom that a scientific conception is born in its final form or owns a single parent. More often it is a product of a series of minds, each in turn modifying the ideas of those that came before and providing material for those who come after.”

Salam, inspired by the discovery of unification of electric and magnetic forces, Maxwell, and Einstein’s dream of uniting all the forces into one, set out in pursuit of a common thread linking the electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces. The path he trod was not a bed of roses.

An important thing to begin was the requirement of a specific theoretical framework in which to fit in the idea of electroweak synthesis. The gauge theory of mathematics that was developed by Yang and Mills in the mid 1950s provided such a framework. Gauge theory was not new to Salam. In fact, one of his students Ronald Shaw had independently employed the gauge ideas of Maxwell with the internal symmetry of proton-neutron system in 1955. However his Ph. D thesis work remained unpublished and thereby relatively unknown.

Now the difficulty was that in order to be related, the W boson (carrier of weak force) and photon (carrier of electromagnetic force) must have had the same spin. Instead, the experimental data available in 1950s showed that W boson if existed at all exhibited no spin. Later it turned out that the experiments had been conducted wrong.  In September 1956, at the Seattle Conference, Salam heard Yang and Lee, the Chinese American scientists. They proposed that weak nuclear force violates the left-right symmetry. The proposal was alarmingly thought provoking as the symmetry of the particles was a big hurdle in the theory of electromagnetic-weak forces unification.

In the plane on his way back to London from America, unable to sleep, he kept thinking of reason for the violation of symmetry in weak interactions. During this thinking flashed back the question Rudolf Peierl had asked him during his Ph. D examination. The question was, “because of Maxwell’s principle of a gauge symmetry electromagnetism, photon is massless, what is the reason that neutrino does not have a mass?” At that time no one knew the answer to that question. Now during the long and restless journey over the Atlantic Ocean, came the answer to Salam’s mind. The photon analogue for the gauge symmetry was neutrino. That will explain as to why neutrino does not have mass, it violates chiral symmetry and travels exactly with the velocity of light. Next morning, very thrilled, Salam headed straight from the plane to the Cavendish laboratory, worked out the necessary parameters and consequences of the symmetry, rushed out and took a train to Birmingham where Peierls lived. However, Peierl refused to accept Salam’s idea as an answer to his question. He replied very kindly that he did not believe at all in the violation of left-right symmetry in the case of weak nuclear forces. After this rejection, Salam went straight to European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva to meet Pauli, the father of Neutrino. Pauli read Salam’s paper and returned it back next morning with a message, “tell my friend Salam to think of something better”. It must have been heart breaking indeed but Salam was not to give up.

The exceeding disappointment came to an end when a few months later, Mrs. Wu’s, Lederman’s and Telegdi’s experiments provided the experimental evidence of symmetry violation. Pauli wrote a fairly apologetic letter to Salam in January, 1957. The idea of uniting the weak and the electromagnetic force was developed one step further in late 1958. However, the story does not go smooth from here either. More contradictions were ahead.

The next ideas Salam proposed faced vicious contradiction from Pauli which was terrible and discouraging. Salam very carefully put aside Pauli’s fierce and prejudiced attitude towards the unification ideas, and concentrated on the points that were rightly raised. These points were directed towards the problem of masses of the Yang and Mills fields and that was a valid issue. The carrier of the strong electromagnetic force, photon is massless, contrarily, the carrier of the weak force, W boson was very heavy, about 100 times heavier than proton. Most of the physicists in 1950s including Wolfgang Pauli were not willing to accept the marriage of a very heavy particle, W boson with the massless photon. Of course they were wrong. The problem was solved seven years later with the understanding of Higgs mechanism. In his Nobel lecture, Salam acknowledged Kibble at the Imperial College for tutoring him the Higgs Mechanism.

In 1961 Goldstone showed that the spontaneous breaking of the continuous internal symmetry paid its price in the appearance of zero mass scalars-a. Salam and Weinberg at the Imperial College London, jointly spent an year to prove this theorem. Eventually, in the years between 1961 and 1967, the phenomenon of symmetry breaking was comprehended. First, it was realized that a pure electromagnetic current versus a pure neutral current complemented each other and along with the gauge particles (W’, Z0 and g) a theory of interaction was constructed that could explain parity violation for weak and parity conservation for the electromagnetic phenomena. Salam and Weinberg independently shaped up the electroweak theory and reported in their elegant papers published in 1968 and 1967 respectively.

The next question was if the theory is renormalizable or not and the proof came from t’Hooft’s work in 1971. As Coleman commented, “t’Hooft’s work turned the Weinberg-Salam frog into an enchanted prince”. The event was just preceded by the GIM (Glashow, Iliopoulos and Maiani) mechanism (1970) emphasizing the existence of the fourth charmed quark and its essential role in resolving the dilemma posed by the absence of strangeness-breaking currents.

Now was the time for the crucial question of experimental or quantitative verification of the theoretical idea as it is utterly imperative in Physics. Salam recalled that on his way to Aix-en-Provence for the 1973 European Conference, along with Paul Mathews, they decided to walk from the train station to the resort where they were supposed to stay. Shortly after, a car drove from behind and stopped. The driver, who happened to be Musset glanced out of the window and asked if he was Salam. Upon affirmative reply, he told Salam to get in the car as he had news for him. The thrilling news was that they had found neutral currents at CERN. Salam, in describing his feelings, quoted a mythical story about Einstein who was asked what he would have thought if experiments had not confirmed his theory of light deflection. Einstein is supposed to have said, “Madam, I would have thought the Lord has missed a most marvelous opportunity”. Certainly, like Einstein Salam also admitted that pure logical thinking has to be supplemented with the empirical support as all knowledge of reality starts with experience and ends in it.

In his Nobel lecture, Salam also indicated that the idea of electroweak unification was talked about as early as in 1937 by Kemmer and in 1936 by Kemmer’s Ph. D supervisor Gregor Wentzel. In addition to these names, Salam mentioned several others in his Nobel lecture in acknowledging their rightful contributions to the electroweak theory. Even then he admitted of inadvertently leaving some names that had in one way or the other contributed to the theory. 

Salam’s theory was now in full bloom. After having passed all the tests, it had emerged as a Truth glowing and flawless. It brought Nobility to its creator, a mysterious Man from the East and I am proud to say from Pakistan. As an honour, Salam was awarded with a Doctorate of Science degree from the Quid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Also the Government of Pakistan issued a postage stamp bearing the statement Abdus Salam, the Scientist of Pakistan.

The particles, W and Z bosons predicted by the electroweak theory were subsequently found at the superprotosynchroton facility at CERN soon after. Carlo Rubbia and Simon Van der Meer from CERN, received Nobel Prize of 1984 for the discovery of these particles. Since this discovery confirmed the earlier prediction made by Salam, Weinberg and Glashow, they were also invited to the 1984 Nobel Prize Ceremony.

The electroweak theory introduced a pattern for the incorporation of all the ideas into what later became known as Standard Model. In the “standard Model” of high energy Physics, Salam’s electroweak theory occupies the core position. It seems the mission is accomplished, but no, wait a minute, Salam was not to stop after the phenomenal victory of the electroweak theory. Together with Jogesh Pati, a pal from India, he speculated unification of the electroweak and strong nuclear forces, named it as Grand Unification. In the context of this new idea, they predicted the proton decay. The theory initiated by Salam remain to be further elaborated and proved.

In the concluding remarks of his Nobel Lecture, Salam expressed his continuous amazement over the depth nature revealed on every occasion it was explored. He also predicted that for the future Physics holds even more surprises, and that it will change even more radically than ever.

Since the theory explains fundamental subatomic phenomena, its implications in the interactions of biological molecules are going to be inevitable. In the due course of time when more of the missing links are found, the theory may lead to the comprehension of many of the health problems. The radioactive compounds due to their beta radiations are already used in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The beta decay of heavy isotopes of carbon into nitrogen is also utilized for dating of organic archeological remains. It is very much likely that the knowledge will eventually be exploited to change the future of medical diagnostics, treatment and/or agricultural production. However, it is hard to predict how long it will take to discover and develop a more revolutionary technology on the grounds of the basic phenomenon the theory has revealed. Unfortunately, in addition to the beneficial uses, the world has also seen the misuse of acquired nuclear physics knowledge and its destructive effects. However, Salam had always emphasized for the use of nuclear fision and fusion in the constructive pursposes, such as generation of power and increase in the agricultural or food yield etc. As a Scientific secretary, Salam contributed in the organization of two Geneva conferences on Peaceful Use of Atomic Energy held in 1955 and 1958. Glashow envisioned that the electroweak theory provided an amazing connection between physics, elementary particle physics and astro-physics.

Salam believed in doing to the best of his abilities without worrying of the ultimate results in the sense of materialistic achievements. He never showed signs of despair for what could not be achieved. His curious mind rejoiced the wonders of exploration, and he named his sense of wonder as his inspiration. He seemed to agree with Eistein who believed that in our materialistic ages only a deeply religious human being could be a serious research scholar. 

Walter Gilbert (Wally) remembered him with immense regard as the mysterious man of East.  Wally, who became a renowned Professor of Theoretical Physics at Harvard University, had completed his degree under the guidance of Abdus Salam. Wally was at Cambridge when the double-stranded DNA molecule was discovered and he was a close friend of James Watson. Perhaps, influenced by his friend Jim, Wally switched to Biology. This very promising student received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for discovering the “repressor” just a year after Salam and made his guru duly proud of him.

Salam’s profound interest in raising the level of fundamental science in the developing countries led to the creation of International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in Trieste, Italy. For over thirty years, Salam as a Director with full dedication kept the Centre afloat. He raised finds on constant basis from Italian Government, from the City of Trieste, from the UN, from the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, from a host of foundations and private benefactors. The Center provides the scientists with opportunities to communicate with their peers from the developed countries and encourages them to publish their work. In a period of over 30 years, the centre has hosted more than 60,000 scientists from 150 countries. The center organized several meetings and welcomed the visitors in many areas of science. Other than particle physicists, the visitors of ICTP belonged to the areas of plasma physics, environmental analysis, chemistry and molecular biology.

Another of Salam’s important contributions has been the establishment of Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) in Trieste, Italy in 1985. The funds were again arranged from different sources including UN, Italian Government and others. Its functions include short term scholarships to the scientists from the developing countries for attending international seminars and/or workshops related to their research. The Academy also provides funds for basic research to the academic staff in the developing countries.

In Pakistan, Abdus Salam Award to the scientists for the best performance was established in 1995. Science was his mission and he spent every penny of the Nobel Prize he received for the betterment of Science in his home country, Pakistan. The mysterious man from East stands above all the praises that I can think of. His work speaks for him.

I would like to conclude my talk with an answer to someone’s question,

Is Abdus Salam coming to the Seminar?

The answer is yes; he is very much with us today. Great people never die.

 

Send questions or comments to Pervaiz Salahuddin